Platform options
Compare three paths: extend an existing platform through a unified API, launch a branded platform foundation, or scope a custom build with source-code requirements.
Three deployment paths
Each option below is a starting framework. Final modules, third-party fees, recurring costs, delivery responsibilities, and timelines are confirmed in a scoped proposal.
Best for an existing platform that needs additional content or modules through a defined integration layer.
Full-platform route
Best for a team planning a branded operator platform with the core operational requirements scoped together.
Best for a project with specific workflows, ownership expectations, or self-hosting requirements.
Pricing clarity: Prices shown are starting setup fees. Final inclusions, third-party fees, recurring costs, delivery scope, and commercial terms are confirmed in the proposal.
Side-by-side
This is a route selector, not a substitute for technical discovery. The final architecture can combine elements from more than one path.
| Decision factor | API integration | Turnkey platform | Custom & source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best starting point | Existing platform | New branded platform | Specific product requirements |
| Core objective | Connect more modules | Launch an operating foundation | Shape a custom-owned stack |
| Front-end scope | Existing front end | Brand configuration | Custom UI/UX scope |
| Back-office scope | Integration-dependent | Included in project planning | Defined around workflows |
| Hosting path | Existing environment | Planned with deployment | Self-hosting requirements scoped |
| Starting setup fee | $1,499 | $4,999 | $14,999 |
Shared foundation
Whichever path you select, the project should define the same critical interfaces: player identity, money movement, content sessions, operator controls, data ownership, and production responsibilities.
Target territories, currencies, languages, content mix, and operational model.
Balance ownership, transaction states, gateways, reconciliation, and control points.
APIs, provider connections, data flows, callbacks, fallbacks, and responsibilities.
Back-office workflows, environments, QA, access, documentation, and ongoing support terms.
From brief to build
A useful project conversation should end with clearer inputs, owners, dependencies, and decisions—not a vague feature list.
Send a project brief→Capture the platform, market, modules, ownership expectations, and commercial priorities.
Identify integrations, data owners, environments, third parties, and open decisions.
Document inclusions, exclusions, milestones, ongoing costs, and delivery responsibilities.
Move into technical access, build work, test environments, validation, and handover.
Commercial questions
If your requirements cross two packages, that is normal. The objective is to scope the right architecture—not force the project into a card.
Explore technical insightsThe API Integration package is the natural starting point when a platform already has its own front end or core and needs broader content, sportsbook, wallet, or payment connectivity.
The turnkey route combines branded web infrastructure, back-office controls, provider connectivity, payment integration, and deployment support in one launch path.
It can be scoped around code ownership, database, hosting, and handover requirements. Final rights and responsibilities are defined in the proposal and contract.
They are starting setup prices. The final scope depends on providers, markets, modules, custom design, hosting, compliance, and integration requirements.
The team reviews the requirements, confirms the most suitable architecture, and follows up through the contact method supplied in the brief.
Need a recommendation?
Share your platform, required modules, and ownership preferences. Start with the facts and shape the right technical conversation.